![]() Depending on the size of the audience, we will assign each challenge to one or more groups and ask them to brainstorm possible solutions that programs can implement to address those challenges, or additional research that could be done to better understand how to address the problem from a “delightful experience” perspective. After brainstorming these challenges, we’ll vote on the top five challenges to tackle together during the workshop. With that overview in mind, we will then ask participants to share the accessibility challenges their programs are facing or those they believe they will have to resolve. We will share lessons learned along the way, including best practices and tips, which you can use as you embark on your own accessibility journey. This workshop will begin with a discussion of Microsoft’s journey to creating a delightful exam experience that is only possible through a close partnership with ITS and Pearson VUE, who worked together to identify and prioritize the challenges preventing the experience from being delightful, and to develop solutions. Pat Hughes, Internet Testing Solutions Liberty Munson, Microsoft Don Tanedo, Microsoft Joan Lambert, Pearson VUE Session Description: This session will interest psychometricians, test providers, and sponsors, as we grapple with the multi-dimensional issue of fairness in credentialing.Įxams Can Be “Delightful”: Reconsidering Accessibility with a Customer Focus ![]() Exam score, pass rate, testing time, and effect sizes will be presented, as well as gender, age, and educational levels. This session will shed light on mode effects by demographics: Does the use of OP do anything to lessen the differences? That is, if there is a performance gap between ethnic groups under TC delivery, does it become smaller, remain unchanged, or get larger via OP delivery? The studies in this session will address these questions in the context of multi-state regulatory exams and a continued professional certification exam, delivered via TC and OP, to candidates of different ethnicities. However, until now, the mode effects on subgroups such as gender and ethnicity have not been examined. Research has found mode differences between exams delivered in test centers (TC) versus online proctoring (OP). Hao Song, NBCRNA James Davis, Pearson VUE Jinghua Liu, Pearson VUE Session Description: At the end of the workshop, we will solicit co-authors and make an initial plan for continuing the work post-ATP.ĭifferential Impact of Test Center Versus Online-Proctored Delivery on Gender, Ethnicity, and Other Examinee Subgroups The goal will be to collect information from attendees and to solicit colleagues to participate in a post-conference paper, special topics journal, or book. We will also compile success stories about general characteristics of content that work well with certain response formats. We will compile open questions and then break into small groups to discuss these ideas further. We will start the workshop with a brief review of what is already known about AITs and then open a group discussion, inviting all the participants to share their experiences with AITs, including where they see an important lack of evidence-based measurement. While AITs aren't inherently better, we do know that they can affect item performance characteristics. ![]() This workshop will be a collaborative session compiling information on existing - and still needed - research on alternative item types (AITs). Alternative Item Types: What We Know and What We Still Need to Find Outīelinda Brunner, Inteleos Cynthia Parshall, Touchstone Consulting Kirk Becker, Pearson VUE Ruth Ramstad, Pearson VUE Session Description: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |